<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../assets/xml/rss.xsl" media="all"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Billy Shin (Posts about models)</title><link>https://www.okbilly.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://www.okbilly.com/categories/models.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><language>en</language><copyright>Contents © 2026 &lt;a href="mailto:countzen@gmail.com"&gt;Billy Shin&lt;/a&gt; </copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 22:38:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>Nikola (getnikola.com)</generator><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><item><title>Mental Models</title><link>https://www.okbilly.com/posts/mental-models/</link><dc:creator>Billy Shin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have always had a vague recollection of mental models, perhaps on thinking about HOW to think.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recently, I was pointed to a book, called &lt;a class="reference external" href="https://fs.blog/tgmm/"&gt;The Great Mental Models by Shane Perris&lt;/a&gt; , and it put into words the vague recollection and grasp I had on mental models, which I relied on reflexivly and intuitively.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I find it, often, its hard to think! You are lost in the details, and consequences of your decision and the follow up actions. I have to get away from these compunding factors to think clearly about the problem or task at hand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I realize, I often fall back on first principal thinking, but in reality that's only one way of many, in how to approach a problem, and other models may work better to certain situations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;dl&gt;
&lt;dt&gt;The models:&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Inversion Principal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Always invert&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;First Principals&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is the thing you can't reduce?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;2nd (and perhaps, third) order affects&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;What are the affects of ths your action, and what are the affects of those affects?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Circle of Confidence&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Probablistic Thinking&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Occam's razor&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Simplest systems, with the least moving parts, are the most likely to be true&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hanlon's razor&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thought Experiments&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Map is not the Territory&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;ul class="simple"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our representations (maps, models, words, beliefs) of reality are not reality itself (the territory); they are simplifications that can be useful but are incomplete and can lead to errors if mistaken for the complex, actual world&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;/dd&gt;
&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am going to be writing more in depth about this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>models</category><category>thinking</category><guid>https://www.okbilly.com/posts/mental-models/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 23:16:03 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>